We are commited to helping our current clients and future clients finding the the best information about Human Resources, Employee Benefits, Payroll, and Workers' Compensation & Safety.
Healthcare Reform: What Now?
Thursday, January 21, 2010

Here is a great article about Healthcare Reform now that Massachusetts elected a Republican to the Senate.
Healthcare Reform: What Now? Click here to continue reading.
Labels: California, Health, Politics
Proposed law would require pay for sick workers
Monday, November 9, 2009

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. employers who tell workers to stay home when they are sick will have to give them paid time off for up to five days under new federal legislation proposed on Tuesday.
The emergency law would cover pandemic H1N1 flu or any other infectious disease, said California Representative George Miller, a Democrat who chairs the House Education and Labor Committee and who introduced the bill.
"Sick workers advised to stay home by their employers shouldn't have to choose between their livelihood, and their co-workers' or customers' health," Miller said.
"This will not only protect employees, but it will save employers money by ensuring that sick employees don't spread infection to co-workers and customers, and will relieve the financial burden on our health system swamped by those suffering from H1N1."
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises employers to encourage sick workers to stay home so they do not spread H1N1. "But workers have been reporting that many of them are either afraid or cannot afford to take time off," Miller told reporters in a telephone briefing.
Paid sick leave is not required by U.S. laws.
Miller said the committee would hold a hearing the week of November 16 and he would press to have a full vote as soon as possible.
Miller said at least 50 million American workers are not paid for time taken off sick, "many in lower-wage jobs that have direct contact with the public such as the food-service and hospitality industry, schools and health care fields."
MORE VACCINE READY
In a regular briefing, CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said 31.8 million doses of flu vaccine have now become available -- still far short of the minimum of 80 million to 100 million that had been projected for the first week of November.
This number includes vaccine already administered. Frieden said CDC hoped 10 million new doses will have been made available by the end of the week.
He said the pandemic may be having an unexpected side-effect -- increasing demand for the seasonal influenza vaccine. "We think this year will be the highest ever uptake on seasonal flu vaccine," Frieden said.
"We anticipate there being around 114 million doses of seasonal flu vaccine available through the market by the end of the year. It may be there is even greater demand than that by the end of the season."
This includes healthcare workers, who are often reluctant to be vaccinated. In recent years, only around 38 to 40 percent of healthcare workers get flu vaccines, but that percentage may be higher this year, Frieden said.
As with the vaccine against H1N1 swine flu, distribution is slow and patchy for seasonal flu vaccine. "We continue to hear that people are unable to get the vaccine," Frieden said.
The United States buys both seasonal and H1N1 vaccine from five makers -- GlaxoSmithKline Plc, AstraZeneca Plc's MedImmune unit, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and CSL Limited.
Some members of Congress and media commentators complained that detainees at Guantanamo Bay -- the U.S. base in Cuba -- would receive H1N1 vaccines when Americans were still struggling to find them.
But White House spokesman Robert Gibbs denied this on Tuesday. "There is no vaccine in Guantanamo and there's no vaccine on the way to Guantanamo," he told reporters.
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor
Labels: Employees, Employers, Health, law, Politics
Senators Consider Dropping Required Employer Coverage From Health Care Reform Bill
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Senators who are trying to craft a bipartisan health care reform proposal are considering dropping a requirement that all employers provide medical coverage to employees.
In its place would be a "free rider" provision requiring employers to pay for employees who get their health care with government assistance, according to an outline of the committee's policy proposals.
Labels: Benefits, Employers, Politics, Washington
COBRA, Unemployment May Feel Long-Term Bite of Stimulus Plan
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Another way the stimulus law could endure is by launching broader health care reform. It contains $19 billion to establish a national health information technology system to support computerized medical records for every American by 2014.
Continue reading this story here.
Labels: Employers, Human Resource, law, Politics
Deep Corporate Staff Cuts Heat Up H-1B Visa Debate
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Long backed by the U.S. tech industry as crucial to American competitiveness, H-1Bs let computer programmers, electronics engineers and other skilled workers stay in the country for up to six years.
Find out what is progressing with this topic in Washington.
President Obama Caps Pay...
Thursday, February 5, 2009
President Barack Obama on Wednesday imposed a $500,000 cap on senior executive pay for the most distressed financial institutions receiving taxpayer bailout money and promised new steps to end a system of "executives being rewarded for failure."
Obama announced the unusual government intervention into corporate America at the White House, with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner at his side. The president said the executive-pay limits are a first step, to be followed by the unveiling next week of a sweeping new framework for spending what remains of the $700 billion financial industry bailout that Congress created last year.
Continue reading this story here on Yahoo News
House Approves Pay Discrimination Bill Again, Sends to Obama
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
President Barack Obama will soon be able to fulfill a campaign promise by signing a pay discrimination bill into law that was passed by the House on Tuesday, January 27, in a 250-177 vote.
The measure, known as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, would make it easier for workers to sue for pay inequities.
The House acted on a bill the Senate approved January 22. The House originally passed the measure as part of a larger pay discrimination package January 9. But the Senate acted only on the Ledbetter portion, which necessitated another House vote.
Obama and first lady Michelle Obama made the Ledbetter bill a centerpiece of campaign events designed to highlight women’s issues.
Under the legislation, each paycheck that has been diminished by discrimination is a separate violation of civil rights law. The statute of limitations for filing a suit would run 180 days from each paycheck. A worker could recover two years of back pay.
Opponents argue that the bill eviscerates the statute of limitations, potentially subjecting businesses to lawsuits over pay decisions that date back decades at a time when they are trying to cope with the recession.
Supporters say that the bill overturns a 2007 Supreme Court decision. Ledbetter, a former supervisor at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber plant in Alabama, sued the company for paying her less than her male counterparts for 20 years.
Continue reading this story here
Written by Workforce Management writer —Mark Schoeff Jr.
Labels: Employers, Human Resource, law, Politics, President, rules, Washington
Stay Connected to ESG republic
Previous Posts
- 5 AMAZING ALLERGY FACTS
- HOW TO GET THAT SECOND WIND……
- You're Late! - An Employers Problem
- 5 Things To Look For In A California HR Organizati...
- Healthcare Reform: What Now?
- Be Healthier in 2010.
- A New Year.
- Happy Holidays!
- Senior Giving.
- Stay Healthy This Holiday Season
Archives
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010

