Connect to ESG

 

   

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

ESG republic HR, Payroll, Benefits, and Workers' Comp. Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

5 Reasons to Switch From a Payroll Service to An HRO

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

5 Reasons

Most business owners don't realize what an HR Outsourcing company can provide. Here are 5 reasons your company should switch from a payroll service to an HRO.

Liability

With an HR Outsourcing company you have a co-employer relationship and with a co-employer relationship you get shared liability with those employees. Payroll taxes and unemployment claims are taken care of by the HR Outsourcing company. Therefore, the HRO is 100 percent liable for that part of it and the business owner doesn’t have to worry about those kind of liabilities. So there’s a shared liability that the employee now have a vested interest with the HRO.

Efficiency

The efficiency with a payroll service is you only have one company that just processes payroll. That’s all they do. With an HRO, you have an entire company of experts that handle payroll, benefits, worker’s comp, safety and human resources. This means you have one company that provides all of these services to you. So therefore, having one person or company handling all of these things, which is maybe a low cost, but it’s not necessarily as efficient as having a team of experts. You can have an entire company for roughly the same price or maybe even cheaper than your one or two employees internally or any outside payroll service. This provides a great deal of efficiency for business owners.

Expertise

The value of the expertise comes in with an HRO that has a number of employees with a great deal of experience in Human Resources, Payroll, Benefits, Workers' Compensation and Safety. Whereas some business owners, only have a couple of employees internally that have to learn as they go. They know a little about HR, safety, and worker’s comp. With an HRO, you have people that just do HR and that’s all they’ve learned and they’ve done it for a number of years. They have a great wealth of knowledge in HR. You also get a company that has worker’s comp experts that knows worker’s comp laws, regulations and restrictions. Also, you will have the same experts with payroll and benefits. You have people that have spent a great deal of time and years learning these things, so you don’t have to.

Convenience

The convenience is having one company you call for all payroll questions. You also have one company to call for any employee administration related questions. So any questions related to payroll, benefits, HR, worker’s comp, and safety have one phone number to call. Whereas before, if they had a number of different outsourced services they’d have to call five or six different numbers to get their questions answered.

But with an HRO you’re able to call one number and have one point of contact. Which then can be able to go to all the different departments within that HRO and be able to get your answer taken care of. So it’s very convenient to be able to have just one source to handle any type of employee questions.

Options

When you deal with an HRO, they have large amounts of employees under their belt and therefore they go out and get your company voluntary benefits. So employees now have access to discount theme park tickets, discount movie tickets, Aflac, and more services that a smaller company does not have the time to get these extra benefits. Services like these really do improve the workplace environment. Let's not forget that having options of multiple insurance plans, 401k plans and multiple dental plans provides companies an advantage to hiring a more skilled workforce. There’s such a great array of options when you work with an HRO. These different options for businesses are invaluable to look over.

Most business owners don't realize that an HRO or even administrative companies provide all of the services under one roof. If you have any kind of problems with payroll, human resources, benefits, workers' compensation or safety in your business, you should check into and HRO. Having issues in any of those items can be very expensive to deal with and costly. It could ruin your business.Why wait until you have that problem? Find an HRO or an administrative company and see if it makes sense for your business.

Why Your Employee Handbook Should Have A Social Media Policy.

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Social Media and Your Employee Handbook.

Having a Social Media Policy in your Employee Handbook is very important in our new online world.

One reason you want a Social Media Policy is to protect your company information. If you have confidential information within your company you want to ensure that your employee’s are not posting confidential information online. Posting proprietary information on how to make a product or certain company information is confidential information. Because Social Media outlets are viewed by many people, an employer wants to make sure their information is protected. So having a social media policy which outlines the dos and don’ts will help regulate how employees appropriately use social media in the workplace.

The number two reason why an employer should have a social media policy is to set guidelines. A question an employer should ask themselves is; what is acceptable? Such as, on a blog. What is acceptable on a social networking personal site? You want to ensure if someone does have his or her own personal blog or personal networking site, you want to outline what is acceptable. Also, outline if employees do identify themselves as employees of your company, you want to make sure it’s in a positive light, without any negative commentary. Make sure you outline a set of rules and guidelines of what’s acceptable within the policy.

The third reason why you should have a social media policy is to protect yourself from claims. Claims is a broad statement used here. Claims can be about unemployment claims, wrongful termination claims, and possibly some wage and hour claims as well. In regards to unemployment claims, if you have a social media policy and it’s evident an employee has violated this policy, more than likely this employee will be denied and therefore will not receive unemployment benefits.

Having a social media policy can also protect you from wrongful termination claims. If an employer outlines the rules and guidelines for the use of social media in the workplace, a claim for wrongful termination is less likely.

To be proactive, we recommend contacting an HR Outsourcing company(ESG republic) and working with them to see what kind of social media policy your company needs. There are certain industries or jobs where you may not be on the computer or have access to cell phones all day. So a social networking policy may not be as needed. But if social networking is a part of the way you do business, then an employer needs to start looking at certain resources and look at what works best in your organization.

In this day and age, if your organization is utilizing social media as a marketing tool, a Social Media policy is needed so you can monitor what employees are posting or doing on social media networking sites.

"I Quit This Job!", What Every Employer Doesn't Want To Hear

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

 I Quit. Every Employers Nightmare.

Why do employers need a letter of resignation from an employee who is quitting?

A letter of resignation is needed for many reasons. One reason is unemployment claims. If an employee quits and does not provide a letter of resignation, then the employee has the ability to change their reason for quitting when they file an unemployment claim and mostly like win. The inconsistent reason for quitting can result in the employee winning the claim and be awarded benefits.
 
There are certain circumstances when an employee can quit  with “good cause” and still be eligible for unemployment. An employee will likely be awarded unemployment benefits if:
 

 

  • Working conditions were detrimental to their health and safety. The work was making them physically ill.
  • The employee had to follow a spouse out of town for a job.
  • The employee needed to take care of a dependent child. 

Above are just a few reasons for a quit with “good cause” attributable to employment but these items need to be documented as the final reason for leaving the job. Whether these statements are true or not, the employer needs the documentation from the employee for effective control of unwarranted claims.


How can an employer protect themselves against false unemployment claims?

There are two ways that an employer can protect their company.

 

  1. Documentation. An employer must document the history of performance of an employee. The documentation should be kept in their employee file and reviewed periodically to ensure all matters have been addressed. The resignation should also be included in the employee file.
  2. Hire an HR Outsourcing company. ESG republic, which is an HR Outsourcing company, helps our client’s everyday with employee matters. We provide the assistance with the documentation of each employee. We handle the termination process by visiting on site, on the phone, or having the employee visit our corporate office. When the unemployment claim comes in we attend the hearing with the documentation to support our client against the claim. This gives our clients the security in knowing they have a team of experts helping to control costs and employee matters. 

Whether you use an HR Outsourcing company or do it yourself, make sure you have your employee give you a reason for their resignation. This could save you from an unwanted unemployment claim.

Why do you need Co-Employment?

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Co-Employment Relationship

Why do you need Co-Employment?

Business owners want to focus their time and energy on the "business of their business" and not on the "business of employment." As businesses grow, most owners do not have the necessary human resource training, payroll and accounting skills, the knowledge of regulatory compliance, or the backgrounds in risk management, insurance and employee benefit programs to meet the demands of being an employer. A Co-Employment gives small-group markets access to many benefits and employment amenities they would not have otherwise.

You still run the company you started, but with less headache.

The client retains ownership of the company and control over its operations. A Co-Employer and client will contractually share or allocate employer responsibilities and liabilities. The Co-Employer will assume responsibilities and liabilities associated with a "general" employer for purposes of administration, payroll, taxes and benefits. The client will continue to have responsibility for site specific items including direction and control of the workers. In general terms, Co-Employer will focus on employment-related issues and the client will be responsible for the actual business operations.

More companies are turning to co-employment options.

It is estimated that 2-3 million Americans are currently benefiting from a co-employment relationship. The average company in the industry has grown more than 20 percent per year for each of the last six years, according to a survey of the National Association of Professional Employer Organization members. The industry generates approximately $51 billion in gross revenues annually and professional employers have an exceptionally high client retention rate due to strong client and employee satisfaction.

Watch the HIRE Act webinar for payroll issues

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Did you miss the HIRE Act webinar? You can watch it now.

Learn  how the HIRE Act will help you handle the complex payroll issuses that will show up. Also, how a company like ours(ESG republic) can help you with those issuses.

 

HIRE Act Webinar Slides

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Today's HIRE Act webinar provided great information. Please download the attached slides.

HIRE-Act-Webinar-Slides.pdf

HIRE Act Webinar for Employers

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

 

Free Webinar - June 9th @ 10am(PST) 

We are offering a free webinar about the HIRE Act. Learn more and sign up today.

What will be discussed?

Under the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act, enacted March 18, 2010, two new tax benefits are available to employers who hire certain previously unemployed workers (“qualified employees”).

The first, referred to as the payroll tax exemption, provides employers with an exemption from the employer’s 6.2 percent share of social security tax on wages paid to qualifying employees, effective for wages paid from March 19, 2010 through December 31, 2010.

In addition, for each qualified employee retained for at least 52 consecutive weeks, businesses will also be eligible for a general business tax credit, referred to as the new hire retention credit, of 6.2 percent of wages paid to the qualified employee over the 52 week period, up to a maximum credit of $1,000. 

Sign up here -  http://blog.esgrepublic.com/hire-act-webinar/ 

12 Manager Mistakes That Spark Lawsuits for Employers

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

 

Lawsuits by employees against their employers have grown tremendously in the past decade. Sometimes those lawsuits have merit, sometimes they don’t. But, either way, those lawsuits cost time and money to fight—money that is better spent on product development, training and raises.

Even worse, some laws—including federal overtime law and the Family and Medical Leave Act—allow employees to sue their supervisors directly, meaning a manager’s personal bank account could be at stake.

Most lawsuits are not triggered by great injustices. Instead, simple management mistakes and perceived slights start the snowball of discontent rolling downhill toward the courtroom.

Here are 12 of the biggest manager mistakes that harm an organization’s credibility in court. Use these points as a checklist to shore up your personal employment-law defense:

1. Sloppy documentation

Most discrimination cases aren’t won with “smoking gun” evidence. They’re proven circumstantially, often through documents or statements made by managers. Documents, particularly e-mail, can help the employee show discriminatory intent. The lesson:Always speak and write as if your comments will be held up to a jury some day.

2. Not knowing policies, procedures

Courts expect supervisors to know their organization’s policies and procedures. If a manager admits ignorance, legal experts say juries typically view that as purposeful, not forgetfulness.

That’s why it’s vital to make sure you understand company policies. Don’t make decisions based on a vague memory of a policy. Double check it or check with HR before taking action.

3. Inflated appraisals

Performance reviews are one of the most important forms of documentation, yet managers sometimes inflate the ratings for various reasons. If a manager later tries to cite “poor performance” for that same person’s termination or demotion, those overly positive appraisals create a heap of credibility concerns.

Be direct, honest and consistent.

4. Shrugging off complaints

Turning a blind eye to any employees’ complaints of unfairness or perceived illegal actions is a guaranteed credibility buster. Comments like “I’m not a baby sitter” or “Boys will be boys” will hurt employee morale and jeopardize your standing in court.

5. Interview errors

It may be easy to answer the question, “Why did you hire that person?” But managers often run into trouble when they have to answer, “Why did you reject certain other candidates?”

That’s because rejection decisions typically aren’t well-documented and the decision-maker may not recall the reasons later.

During interviews, stay away from any question that doesn’t focus on this central issue: How well would this person perform the job he or she has applied for? Never ask about age, race, marital status, children, day care plans, religion, health status or political affiliation.

6. Changing your story

If an organization changes its reasoning for making an adverse employment decision (firing, discipline, demotion, etc.) in midstream, its credibility is shot.

Be straight with employees from the start about reasons for discipline. Don’t sugarcoat your comments.

7. ‘Papering’ an employee’s file

Most managers hear the mantra, “Document, document, document.” But it’s possible to overdocument, especially when it occurs right before a firing. Courts will be able to see through a rush of disciplinary actions cited in the days before a termination.

Be consistent in documenting negative and positive performance and behavior of employees. It’s best to keep a “performance log” for each employee, regularly making notes in each file.

8. Being rude, mean-spirited

An organization can have the best case in the world, but if the key supervisor comes across as rude, insensitive and mean, the attorney’s job of selling the case to the jury will be much harder.

Use the golden rule in handling staff.

9. Careless statements to feds

When responding to charges filed with the EEOC or state agencies, employers often have to submit position statements. Managers may be called upon to help provide some of that information. You can bet the employee’s attorney will review these statements, particularly affidavits, and introduce them at trial, especially if your story has changed. Keep your story consistent.

10. Lack of legal knowledge

Juries will expect—and the plaintiff’s lawyer will encourage them to expect— that employers stay abreast of developments in employment law. Refresh yourself regularly on your organization’s policies, read communications sent from HR and, when in doubt, ask questions.

11. Dictating accommodations Under federal law, employers must make “reasonable” workplace changes to accommodate an employee’s disability. How to choose those accommodations? It must be a give-and-take process to reach a solution, the law says. Managers too often try to dictate the solution.

12. Firing employees too fast Managers who fire without first trying to improve the worker’s performance will appear insensitive and potentially discriminatory in court. Conversely, managers who try to improve things before resorting to firing will stand a better chance of avoiding a lawsuit. 

Need help with your HR department? Get started here. 

Top 7 Things Your Employee Handbook Should Have

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Regardless of how small or large your organization may be, running an organization without polices and guidelines is very challenging. Having a well-written employee handbook is very beneficial because it communicates to employees their rights and obligations as an employee. It lays out your workplace do's and don'ts and is the connecting link that establishes the employee/employer relationship.

Two New Tax Benefits Aid Employers Who Hire and Retain Unemployed Workers

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Employers who hire unemployed workers this year (after Feb. 3, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2011) may qualify for a 6.2-percent payroll tax incentive, in effect exempting them from their share of Social Security taxes on wages paid to these workers after March 18, 2010. This reduced tax withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits, and employers would still need to withhold the employee’s 6.2-percent share of Social Security taxes, as well as income taxes. The employer and employee’s shares of Medicare taxes would also still apply to these wages.

 Continue reading. 

All Posts